We make voices heard that nobody else reaches.

Because they sit in no panel and don't answer for points. We ask them where they already are: on social media. One-off surveys, trackers, your own questionnaires in the field. Plus simulations for indicative pre-studies and more.

Illustrative photos, not our respondents. Photos (Unsplash): Tatiana Zanon, Matteo Vistocco, Good Faces, Centre for Ageing Better, Ghen Mar Cuaño, Desola Lanre-Ologun.

UBS Sorgenbarometer
Part of the annual fieldwork
gfs.bern uses Boomerang in the SRF Trend Surveys sample
Funded by Innosuisse
Institute member
Swiss Insights · member of DGOF
Recruited onInstagramFacebookTikTokSnapchatLinkedInWhatsApp
Client voices
“We use Boomerang Ideas to gather fast market & consumer insights for our clients and ourselves. It helps us make informed decisions and suggest concepts based on consumer insights.”
Patrick Glauser · Managing Partner, TMI AG
“The insights we gained from Boomerang Metrics were invaluable in refining and improving our marketing strategy.”
Carsten Richter · Digital Manager, Lindt & Sprüngli
“Running six targeted Boomerang surveys across multiple markets proved to be fast, intuitive, and engaging. The Boomerang platform delivered professional insights that enabled us to validate our personas and refine our targeting strategy with confidence.”
Philipp Köstner · Lead Online Marketing, BERNINA International
“When you're not sure a new product adds real value, Boomerang Ideas gets you solid, real-market feedback for very little money or effort.”
Ivan Mele · Founder, HEYNEW product testing Translated from German

Classical market research is running out of people

36 % → 6 %

Phone response rate, 1997 → 2018.

Pew Research Center (US)

<1 % → 34 %

Panel members → questionnaires, top 10 US panels.

comScore, 2006

How a survey runs

1

Format

Our AI agent asks: qualitative or quantitative?

2

Questionnaire

The agent's draft, a template, a blank start or your own.

3

Simulation optional

Simulated answers for an indicative result.

4

Fieldwork

Nothing to do. Fresh social media recruitment for every study.

5

Weighting and results

Weighted in the dashboard, live during fieldwork.

instead of mailing listsMicro-targeting
TikTokInstagramFacebookSnapchatLinkedInWhatsApp
instead of pointsReal motivation
instead of long questionnairesBrevity

So you hear from people classical fieldwork no longer reaches.

Algorithm selection bias

1 · POPULATIONfrom ground-truth data2 · PANEL INVITATIONtypical bias, illustrative3 · SOCIAL MEDIA PICTUREeach age group itsown platform mix65+55–6445–5435–4425–3418–24MenWomendashed = populationcolour = platform · count = share
1 · POPULATIONfrom ground-truth data65+55–6445–5435–4425–3418–24MenWomen2 · PANEL INVITATIONtypical bias, illustrative65+55–6445–5435–4425–3418–24dashed = population3 · SOCIAL MEDIA PICTUREeach age group its own platform mix65+55–6445–5435–4425–3418–24colour = platform · count = share
Schematic view. The pyramid is built from official ground-truth statistics and stratified by age, gender and region; the social media picture maps each cohort to the platforms, formats and times where it can actually be reached, such as TikTok and Instagram.
Integrated Social Media Population Model (SMP), schematic; the panel side is illustrative.
Micro-targeting
Cross-quota: CH, DE, AT
Weighted to official statistics
Quality checks

Tested, not claimed

Boomerang vs. established online panel.

81 % vs. 37 %

Passed attention checks.

42 % vs. 20 %

Stay until the end.

UZH study II (USA): n = 1,000 Boomerang, n = 1,000 Qualtrics

All the evidence

2.91 vs. 3.04

Trust in science (1–4): lower, less desirability bias.

p = .001

3.76 vs. 3.96

Survey experience (lower, less practised).

p < .001

2 of 3

Closer to the result than institutes.

UZH pre-study: 13 surveys, n = 416–976

0.25 vs. 3.6

Points off, Nevada 2024. Internal, single case.

100 % human sampling, US 2024

1,000 in 6 days

Institute: 10 days.

UZH pre-study 2021, p. 1: n = 1,000

Anyone can simulate by now

What it is built on: primary data

82.6 %
Overlap, five Swiss surveys held out of training (gfs.bern data)
below 52 %
Frontier models without training
Survey simulation before fieldwork – for indicative results.
Watch the full video0:13
See the live demo
How likely would you be to order pizza delivered by drone?
Very likely
0%
Somewhat likely
0%
Not sure
0%
Somewhat unlikely
0%
Very unlikely
0%
n = 0 / 1'166live simulation
Complete. Under 45, “Very likely” leads — from 45+ “Very unlikely” takes over.

Screen recording, shortened: from the question to the running simulation, then broken down by age

When the simulation is not enough

An independent judge model, Confidence Guard™, scores every simulation from 0 to 10.

8.0 and above · high plausibility

The simulation holds.

6.0 – 7.9 · medium

The ranking holds, the percentages not yet.

below 6.0 · too low

This question needs people to answer it.

Real people are one click away

Our own recruitment, new for every study: on average 7 to 10 days to the result.

The only platform that runs both engines itself and measures them against each other continuously.

BoomSuite, step 1 «Choose your sampling method»: switch set to AI, AI simulations by Calibrated Personas™ for indicative results.The same step, switch set to Human: Human Samples by Live Social Sampling™.
In BoomSuite: AI or human, one switch.

Plausibility measures consistency and fit, never accuracy against a known result.

Funded several times by Innosuisse since 2020. The current project, «Confidence-Driven Augmentation of Synthetic Survey Data», runs with the University of Basel and Johns Hopkins University.

What a project costs

Germany from CHF 4 per completed response, Switzerland and Austria from 5.

Binding after the free pre-test. Target group not found: money back.

Three ways to buy

Single project

only the credits used

Credits
none upfront

Credit pack

CHF 1,950 · 4,950 · 11,950

Credits
2,000 · 5,250 · 12,600 (with bonus)
Validity
12 months
Support
Phone hotline from gfs.bern with packs from CHF 11,950

Credit pack (annual plan)

same price, more credits

Credits
2,100 · 5,500 · 13,200
Validity
as long as the plan runs

Starter, Pro or Team?

Starter

CHF 0

 

1 preview study a month

  • up to 200 respondents per study
  • results by region
  • in-app and email support
Start free
Recommended

Pro

CHF 200 / month

or CHF 2,000 a year

6 full studies a month

  • up to 500 respondents per study
  • by region, age and gender
  • PDF report and raw data included
  • plus onboarding

Pays off at 1 report a month

Start with Pro

Team

Price on request

3 seats

10 full studies a month

  • Up to 10,000 respondents per study, several countries
  • A/B tests, flows and custom channels included
  • real-time simulation: about 1 minute per 1,000 respondents, much faster than Pro
  • shared Boomerangs across the team
Talk to us

Simulated respondents included each month: 200 · 3,000 · 10,000. Extra seats (Pro, Team): CHF 150 a month.

Breakdowns by age, gender or region: reliable for human samples; for simulations, read subgroup results as indicative.

Add-ons: 200 credits per study. 1 credit = CHF 1, valid for every social sampling product.

Get in touch

Reply within 1–3 working days.

Quick answers
Which countries?

24: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Czech Republic, France, Germany, India, Italy, Kenya, Mexico, Nigeria, Poland, Portugal, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, the UK and the USA.

How fast?

7–10 days on average, first answers after 24 hours.

Who owns the data?

You do. GDPR and Swiss FADP compliant.